I’ve noticed a recent change in how I feel about my performance during an ongoing day. Previously my emotions fell into one of two categories:
- I feel good because I’m accomplishing everything I’ve set out to do.
- I feel bad because I failed to do a few things and I give up entirely.
In retrospect it’s easy to admit that success and failure shouldn’t be viewed in such a black and white manner. However, in the heat of the moment it’s almost impossible to maintain that perspective, and I am starting to notice that it is not because of personal weakness. The real problem is how I have chosen to setup my model for success in the past. My model used to be the following: success is the ability to meet a specified goal and failure is everything else.
Upgrading this overly simplistic model of success happened by accident. I started using a TODO-list last week and when on Wednesday I was unable to cross off all my items, I looked at my list and realized that I had still accomplished quite a lot. This got me thinking that perhaps I was asking the wrong question. Maybe It wasn’t about whether I had succeeded or not, and it was more about how much I had succeeded.
Changing the question moves success from a binary choice to a sliding scale. Instead of thinking that accomplishing 80% of your tasks is a failure, you can actually see that you have in fact succeeded. The greatest effect of this way of thinking can be witnessed on days that start off on a bad note. There’s been many days since Wednesday where I’ve been able to salvage a bad morning by remembering that I can still succeed a little bit that day. All I have to do is start tackling tasks and not give up on the day entirely.
I’m not sure if this is of any relevance to you people reading this, but I hope that it will inspire you to rethink your model of success, and then modify your tools and systems to reflect the upgraded model. Anyway, that’s all for now.